[cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans
Jim Sowers
jim at spincycle.org
Tue Nov 21 15:56:02 EST 2006
When I was in law school, back in 1986 ;-( I took a contract writing
class. It had a lasting effect on me. We practiced writing in plain
English -- the teacher worked for Bank of America, and because they had lost
some cases because courts had found their contracts to be unintelligible to
the average consumer (the other party to the contract), BofA found religion
and started re-writing their contracts.
We studied a law review article by Richard Wydick, Plain English for
Lawyers, which is now in its 3rd edition as a book, and which I mentioned in
an earlier post to this list. The SEC has also imposed a "plain English"
requirement on filings. I think CC has done a pretty good job on this front
(with the notable exception of the excessive, and I would argue improper,
use of the word "such" as a definite article, see my earlier post).
Nevertheless, I think the line at the bottom of the deed that reads "This is
a human-readable summary ..." is unfortunate. Obviously, CC intends to say
that it is a simple summary for non-lawyers. Some will think that I'm being
too sensitive here, however, I believe that using the term "human-readable",
aside from reinforcing some of the nastier stereotypes about lawyers, also
reinforces the idea that lawyers use a different, incomprehensible
language. I find that two types of lawyers tend to do so: those not
confident enough to make things simple -- e.g., afraid to replace "any and
all" with just "any", and those who are pompous and throw in every
heretofore and therewith to add to the cloak of mystery around what it is to
practice law. Finally, some of the worst examples come from non-lawyers
trying to "write like lawyers".
Thus, I would change the terminology to reflect "summary" v. "detailed"
rather than "human" v. "lawyer" -- as even the detailed documents should be
eminently readable by humans; those are the kinds of documents really good
lawyers write.
Jim Sowers
Lawyer :-) (DJ, Dance Teacher, Motorcycle Adventurer)
On 11/21/06, Andres Guadamuz <a.guadamuz at ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Luis,
>
> While I don't know if there was any sort of doctrinal consideration with
> the creation of the Commons Deed, I can tell you that at least in
> Scotland we drafted the licences under the requirement of writing form
> contracts in "plain intelligible language" contained in section 6 of the
> the UK's Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999:
> http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1999/19992083.htm
>
> Regards,
>
> Andres
>
> Luis Villa wrote:
> > Hey, all (but really primarily to the lawyers on the list :)-
> >
> > As I was stumbling through Contracts this morning (specifically, a
> > lecture on interpretation of contracts) I was reminded of the human
> > readable versions of CC contracts/licenses. The question that came to
> > mind: were those inspired by any particular strain of academic thought
> > on license legibility/usability? Or did they just come out of a
> > general ease-of-use impulse? If there was a strain of academic thought
> > on the issue that was inspirational or otherwise important, any
> > pointers to where I could start reading?
> >
> > Thanks in advance- let me know if my question itself is incomprehensible
> :)
> > Luis
> > _______________________________________________
> > cc-licenses mailing list
> > cc-licenses at lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> >
>
> --
> Andres Guadamuz
> AHRC Research Centre for Studies in
> Intellectual Property and Technology Law
> Old College, South Bridge
> Edinburgh, EH8 9YL
>
> Tel: 44 (0)131 6509699
> Fax: 44 (0)131 6506317
> a.guadamuz at ed.ac.uk
> http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/
>
> IP/IT/Medical Law LLM by Distance Learning
> http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/distancelearning/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/attachments/20061121/65bd4b3a/attachment.html
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list