[cc-licenses] different license for different bitrate
Evan Prodromou
evan at prodromou.name
Thu Dec 14 13:37:56 EST 2006
On Thu, 2006-14-12 at 23:31 +0900, wiki_tomos at inter7.jp wrote:
> Hi. I guess the photos in your examples are not the same work
> in the strict legal sense. That's because the higher resolution
> photo contains more details, some of which are your creative
> expression of some idea. It is sort of like a synopsis of a novel
> is not the same work as the novel itself.
I think this is a tricky subject. One thing that is important to note is
that the lower-quality version is free to use in any way the license
permits -- including "cleaning it up" so it's comparable to the
higher-quality version.
For example, if I release a plain-text version of a document under a CC
license, but make people pay for the nicer-looking PDF version, I have
little grounds to complain if a licensee converts the plain-text version
to a similar or superior PDF version.
For some lossy compressed file formats (like most music or JPEG files),
this would be a difficult transformation to do, but it is a possibility.
~Evan
________________________________________________________________________
Evan Prodromou <evan at prodromou.name>
http://evan.prodromou.name/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/attachments/20061214/081a6db1/attachment.bin
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list