[cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses
Terry Hancock
hancock at anansispaceworks.com
Wed Dec 6 12:36:02 EST 2006
Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> The reality is that most of the major examples used on this list are
> systems where users cannot apply their own DRM.
*Hypothetical* examples. Most *real* so-called "DRM systems" can
actually play non-DRM content either natively, or with user-installed
software upgrades. In fact, I think this is true for *every* real
example mentioned (remembering once again that ROM-based devices or
devices that simply have no copying ability are *not* "TPM"/"DRM" devices).
> distribution is a prerequisite. As a result, the terms are effectively
> interchangable for the sake of argument.
In these cases, the case for TPM+PD breaking copyleft is much more
strong. Hence there is even more reason to stick to the anti-TPM
formulation.
Cheers,
Terry
--
Terry Hancock (hancock at AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list