[cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses
James Grimmelmann
james at grimmelmann.net
Sat Dec 2 17:14:41 EST 2006
drew Roberts wrote:
>
> So, it is not essential. Would you compromise on all-applied TPM with paralled
> distribution?
To rephrase your question, you're asking me whether I'd be okay with a
clause that said:
Use of DRM on a redistributed CC work is okay ONLY IF:
1) The work is also made available in an unDRMed parallel version, and
2) Everyone is free to apply the DRM.
I would moderately prefer the straightforward parallel distribution
clause to this one. I would much prefer this version to a license
without a parallel distribution. (And I would consider a license
without an anti-DRM clause at all unacceptable.)
James
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list