[cc-licenses] Against DRM 1.0
Max Brown
max05001 at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 14 10:47:58 EDT 2006
On Fri, 2006-14-04 at 05:21 -0700, Max Brown wrote:
Who know "Against DRM 1.0"? It's a free copyleft license for artworks.
> At least from Debian's point of view, it's not Free as in Freedom. Keeping me from porting to > certain platforms makes it not Free to use.
Debian's point of view is the point of view of *two* persons vs. *one* person? :-)
The second clause prevents the use of DRM to protect the work: if licensor uses DRM, the license is not applicable to the work (on the contrary, CCPL licensor can use DRM);
That's not true. See section 4a of Attribution 2.5 (although this has been in all versions so far):
You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological measures that control access or use of the Work in a manner inconsistent with the terms of this License Agreement.
Ccpl *licensor* can use DRM.
Max
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/attachments/20060414/22baa536/attachment.htm
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list