Share-revenues as an alternative to Non-commercial
Mike Linksvayer
ml at creativecommons.org
Tue May 3 17:37:26 EDT 2005
David Christie wrote:
> I've been lurking on this list for a while and reading the archives.
> This is my first post. I'm primarily interested in innovative
> open-source software licenses.
The license you describe wouldn't qualify as open source.
That said, if you're primarily interested in software licenses you might
post your idea to http://creativecommons.org/discuss#commonwealth. The
researcher running that list is interested in such licensing ideas.
Another approach some are interested in exploring is to use a
restrictive CC license (e.g. with NC and/or ND properties) and build
standard terms and metadata to faciliate buying out the rights reserved.
These discussions have been sporadic and tentative, but see
http://sampleright.org and discussion at http://www.musicloversunion.org
for two examples.
Magnatune has implemented a system for purchasing rights reserved to its
releases, see for example
https://magnatune.com/artists/license/?artist=Kyiv+Chamber+Choir&album=Masterpieces+of+the+Ukrainian+Choral+Baroque&genre=Baroque
NB it isn't clear how any of the above fits into CC proper. I'm
interested in metadata interoperability at the very least and commercial
adoption of CC licenses and technologies in general, but I imagine some
of this can/would/will be legally and politically complex.
--
Mike Linksvayer
http://creativecommons.org/about/people#21
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list