2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process
zotz at 100jamz.com
Fri Jun 10 16:48:12 EDT 2005
On Friday 10 June 2005 08:40 am, Rob Myers wrote:
> On Friday, June 10, 2005, at 01:34PM, Evan Prodromou <evan at bad.dynu.ca>
> >Yes, I realize this is kind of a pain, but I believe it's the way the
> >license works.
> I've seen some people propose using langauge similar to that suggested for
> GPL licensing, so for BY_SA that would be something like:
> "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike
> License; either version 2.5 of the License, or (at your option) any later
> I don't know whether this works or not, though. I am not a lawyer.
Unless I am mistaken, it would not work as the license claims to be the entire
> - Rob.
all the best,
More information about the cc-licenses