Free as in freedom (was Re: Music Sharing License Commentary)
Evan Prodromou
evan at wikitravel.org
Fri Mar 19 06:22:31 EST 2004
>>>>> "RM" == Rob Myers <robmyers at mac.com> writes:
RM> Too many licenses will dilute the brand as you point out. But
RM> just a few licenses that aren't really commons/open/free
RM> licenses will destroy value in the brand and, worse, give that
RM> value to people who have no intention of returning it. Being
RM> popular by writing weaker licenses would not be as great a
RM> success as educating people to use stronger licenses.
I happen to agree with you on this, and I think that just as we've
seen free-beer licenses fall by the wayside in the Free Software
world, we're going to see them disappear in the Free Culture world,
too.
But realistically I don't think that Free-as-in-Freedom Culture is a
goal of Creative Commons. Which is fine: CC does great work.
I think it might be something that another group could or should do:
* make a definition of Free Culture or Open Culture along the same
lines as the Open Source Definition
* list and comment on available Open Culture licenses (GFDL, by-sa,
by, sa, DSL, Green Music License, etc.)
* make arguments to artists, publishers, and aficionados about the
value of Free Culture
Anyways, that's my thoughts on the matter. I'm not sure if it's
pertinent to the too-many-licenses problem, but that's beside the
point.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <evan at wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list