[cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing
Nathan R. Yergler
nathan at creativecommons.org
Mon Jan 22 14:12:17 EST 2007
Luis Villa wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <nathan at creativecommons.org> wrote:
>> I admittedly didn't do much testing without MozCC installed v. with it
>> installed, but rather between the old and new version. So I'll take a
>> look as well and see if its something I might have missed.
>
> FWIW, I've been using mozcc religiously (given the conflict, I
> disabled operator, not mozcc ;) so my first comparison was between old
> and new mozcc.
>
So I've taken another look at this and haven't been able to track down
anything firm. Experimenting with MozCC 2.3.9 v. No-MozCC, there *may*
be a subtle difference in load speed for mail.google.com, but not enough
that I think I'd notice if I weren't looking for it. No noticeable
difference looking @ tieguy.org/blog (which I believe is one of the
sites you said displayed the behavior). Anyone know of a way to
instrument Firefox to get firmer numbers on things like this?
Its a little difficult to track down what's going on with the extension
on gmail, since there's so much content generated with Javascript. But
in an effort to streamline things I did a build of MozCC with no console
logging at all. You can find it at
http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/software/mozcc/download/mozcc-2.3.9.1.xpi.
Let me know if it does a better job in terms of performance.
Thanks,
Nathan
> Luis
>
>> Luis Villa wrote:
>> > On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <nathan at creativecommons.org> wrote:
>> >> An updated version of MozCC is now available for testing. Version
>> 2.3.9
>> >> is a recommended update as it resolves a number of outstanding issues
>> >> including:
>> >>
>> >> * Rewrite of the RDFa extraction engine which no longer pollutes
>> >> Javascript prototypes
>> >> * Performance enhancements when extracting RDFa from documents
>> >> * Interoperability fixes with other extensions
>> >
>> > For what it is worth, Nathan, this fixes the interoperability problems
>> > I had with Operator[1] but the new plugin seems to completely degrade
>> > ffox performance on most of the pages I used- took several times
>> > longer to load my blog and mail.google.com. This happens with or
>> > without Operator installed, so it isn't the result of an interaction
>> > with Operator.
>> >
>> > Is anyone else seeing this? I don't have time (class shortly) to
>> > uninstall/disable *all* of my plugins, but I'm guessing if Nathan
>> > didn't see it it must be an interaction with some other plugin, so
>> > I'll have to back everything out later tonight if no one else is
>> > seeing it.
>> >
>> > Luis
>> >
>> > [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4106/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cc-devel mailing list
>> > cc-devel at lists.ibiblio.org
>> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nathan R. Yergler
>> Senior Software Engineer
>> Creative Commons
>>
>> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:NathanYergler
>>
--
Nathan R. Yergler
Senior Software Engineer
Creative Commons
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:NathanYergler
More information about the cc-devel
mailing list