[cc-community] CC-BY-SA for Jailhouse Lawyers?
Mike Linksvayer
ml at creativecommons.org
Fri Nov 25 14:46:26 EST 2011
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:15 AM, drew Roberts <zotz at 100jamz.com> wrote:
> On Friday 25 November 2011 13:52:16 Mike Linksvayer wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:07 AM, drew Roberts <zotz at 100jamz.com> wrote:
>> > I basically wish NC was never a part of cc myself. What I am talking
>> > about though is NC-SA where the NC condition is *waived* if the work is
>> > used in/with a BY-SA work.
>>
>> With this scheme you give permission for your work to be used in an
>> adaptation offered under BY-NC-SA, which I doubt you want.
>
> No, it is not what I want but I would be prepared to live with that if it
> meant that the photos I would rather were BY-SA could not be used in ARR for
> profit books, magazines, newspapers and the like without my OK. If I am
> correct, it would let my BY-SA photos be used in BY-SA books, magazines,
> newspapers and the like without needing my OK.
I find orders of preference interesting -- drew Roberts prefers "allow
use of my images in BY-NC-SA work" to "allow use of my images in
commercial ARR work".
>> Please participate in the upcoming 4.0 process if you care one way or
>> the other, or better yet, have persuasive evidence that one way or
>> another will be better for the commons.
>
> Is having these discussions in cc-community not count as participating in the
> upcoming 4.0 process? If not, what does count?
Any information potentially counts, including 2003 discussions, random
blog posts, here, if said information is pertinent and summarized (ie
someone bothers to) for people who aren't able to scour the web for
all records. I believe the main venues for discussion and summary will
be cc-licenses and a part of the CC wiki dedicated to 4.0 issues, to
be announced.
Mike
More information about the cc-community
mailing list