[cc-community] CC-BY-SA for Jailhouse Lawyers?
jessica at creativecommons.org
Tue Nov 22 16:56:38 EST 2011
What you're talking about here is the difference between a collection and
an adaptation under the licences. And you're right in your understanding of
You can use SA works in a collection (eg a slideshow or a book) without
them being affected by the SA licensing requirement (ie you don't have to
license the collection under the same licence); but any adaptations (eg a
modified version of the photo, or a photo that's been incorporated into a
larger image) do attract the SA requirements.
You'll see the legal definitions of collection and adaptation at the top of
the legal code of the BY-SA and BY-NC-SA licences (eg
Have a look at the material on the FAQ page about adaptations and
collections - maybe that will help.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Paul Houle <paul at ontology2.com> wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 2:06 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
> > On 21/11/11 21:58, Paul Houle wrote:
> >> Every week I hear from people who are perplexed with what
> >> means.
> > If you can provide examples people can make or add to a FAQ.
> I'm specifically interested in the case of photographs and other
> My understanding is that the use of a CC-BY-SA photo in a book does
> not make the book CC-BY-SA. If you crop the photograph and use it in
> your book, you've got to release the cropped photo as CC-BY-SA but
> there's no effect on the book. An image made from the image is a
> derived work, but if the image is simply used as-is in a different
> creative work, there's no issue.
> I'd like to see that stated in words that ordinary people (school
> teachers, professors writing academic textbooks, people writing
> blogs, etc.) understand.
> cc-community mailing list
> cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cc-community