[cc-community] More discussion on NC
zotz at 100jamz.com
Tue Oct 12 08:07:09 EDT 2010
On Monday 11 October 2010 19:55:04 jonathon wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 11:16 PM, drew Roberts wrote:
> > Please CC, consider a FreeCC brand to let those of us wanting to do the
> > Free thing promote our Free works under.
> What is needed is a brand name for the "standard" CC-BY and CC-BY-SA
> license, with a second brand name for the CC-BY-NC-SA license, and a
> third brand name for the CC-BY-NC-ND and CC-BY-ND licenses.
> Libre Commons: BY-SA, BY;
> Gratis Commons: BY-SA-NC;
> Closed Commons: BY-NC-ND, BY-ND;
> ND is as much, if not more of a taint than NC is, for a Free works culture.
Fine by me. but this fix is needed:
Gratis Commons: BY-SA-NC; BY-NC;
although personally I would prefer
Not sure Gratis Commons is actually true. Libre Commons may be gratis and what
you are calling Gratis Commons may not be gratis, at least from the original
So if we go with the three way breakdown, are there better descriptions out
all the best,
More information about the cc-community