[cc-community] Use of CC Images in a photo gallery
Paul Houle
paul at ontology2.com
Wed Jun 24 15:21:00 EDT 2009
Nathan Yergler wrote:
>
> The license states that a "collection" is not considered an adaptation
> for the purpose of the license and therefore does not engage the SA
> clause. See section 1a-b
> (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode).
>
I find the "collection" concept to be disturbing, since it's fuzzy
around the edges. I mean, it has to include things like:
"...For the avoidance of doubt, where the Work is a musical work,
performance or phonogram, the synchronization of the Work in
timed-relation with a moving image ("synching") will be considered an
Adaptation for the purpose of this License"
This is obviously discriminatory against a television show as
compared to a radio program. It's also discriminatory against the
existing motion picture medium as compared to media which have yet to be
discovered.
Has anybody tested this stuff in court?
More information about the cc-community
mailing list