[cc-community] CC needs a default form of attribution?
Evan Prodromou
evan at prodromou.name
Thu May 1 07:42:30 EDT 2008
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 06:01 +0200, Jamison Young wrote:
> > "Attribution. You must credit the author and/or designated
> > organization by name (but not in any way that suggests that they
> > endorse you or your use of the work); note the title of the work; and
> > give the URI and/or text of any copyright notices. If you change the
> > work, you must note the changes."
> >
> > Any feedback on that? I'll see what is thought of it internally.
> Do you think a link from the license might suggest different ways to
> attribute for different uses?
If you mean a link from the license deed (as opposed to the license
text) to something like:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Marking
...I think that's a great idea. In fact, it might be useful as a general
principle to have links in the license deeds to further information
about each license element on the wiki (NC, ND, SA, etc.).
Printing the particulars of how to attribute in myriad different
situations (nightclub, collage, poetry anthology) on the license deed
itself would probably overload the page and make it difficult to read
and understand.
-Evan
--
Evan Prodromou <evan at prodromou.name>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20080501/1718c239/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5175 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20080501/1718c239/attachment.bin
More information about the cc-community
mailing list