[cc-community] An online place to post

drew Roberts zotz at 100jamz.com
Mon Jun 16 19:01:59 EDT 2008


On Monday 16 June 2008 18:56:30 Robert Atwood (lists) wrote:
> drew Roberts wrote:
> > On Monday 16 June 2008 14:23:11 Robert Atwood wrote:
> >> drew Roberts wrote:
> >>> On Monday 16 June 2008 12:36, Robert Atwood wrote:
> >>>> drew Roberts wrote:
> >>>>> I am still interested in hearing from people with
> >>>>> ideas on actually solving this problem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> all the best,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> drew
> >>>>
> >>>> at risk of being facile .. license everything cc--sa and stop worrying
> >>>> 'bout it? :-)
> >>>
> >>> That's the license (cc BY-SA) I use and I don't worry too much about my
> >>> stuff.
> >>
> >> Yes I meant cc-(by/not-by)-sa depending on one;s preference for
> >> attribuiton.
> >
> > cc does not allow us to leave off BY these days does it?
>
> well, within the 'by' clause full text it explicitly states that the
> licensor may request to be anonymous (i.e. the chosen form of
> attribution may be 'none')  so that's I guess the replacement for any
> cc-'not-by'

Ah, got you.
>
> >> Which I agree does indeed help relate the discussion back to (cc).
> >> Unvortunatly I am wasting space cause I don't know the answer;
> >
> > The question I think I was asking is if anyone has any ideas on how a
> > hosting company could keep infringing content off of their site without
> > incorrectly blocking non-infringing content posted by the copyright
> > holder, with the permission of the copyright holder, in the public
> > domain, or properly makeing a fair use of copyrighted material.
>
> I am sort of thinking this is simply not feasable. They come up with all
> these drm schemes and all seem seriously broken in bad ways,

I am not sure it is either, but people seem happy to take away my options to 
distribute my works in order not to have to police theirs....
>
all the best,

drew


More information about the cc-community mailing list