[cc-community] An online place to post

Robert Atwood (lists) lists at atwood.org.uk
Mon Jun 16 18:56:30 EDT 2008


drew Roberts wrote:
> On Monday 16 June 2008 14:23:11 Robert Atwood wrote:
>> drew Roberts wrote:
>>> On Monday 16 June 2008 12:36, Robert Atwood wrote:
>>>> drew Roberts wrote:
>>>>> I am still interested in hearing from people with
>>>>> ideas on actually solving this problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> all the best,
>>>>>
>>>>> drew
>>>> at risk of being facile .. license everything cc--sa and stop worrying
>>>> 'bout it? :-)
>>> That's the license (cc BY-SA) I use and I don't worry too much about my
>>> stuff.
>> Yes I meant cc-(by/not-by)-sa depending on one;s preference for
>> attribuiton.
> 
> cc does not allow us to leave off BY these days does it?

well, within the 'by' clause full text it explicitly states that the 
licensor may request to be anonymous (i.e. the chosen form of 
attribution may be 'none')  so that's I guess the replacement for any 
cc-'not-by'

>>
>> Which I agree does indeed help relate the discussion back to (cc).
>> Unvortunatly I am wasting space cause I don't know the answer;
> 
> The question I think I was asking is if anyone has any ideas on how a hosting 
> company could keep infringing content off of their site without incorrectly 
> blocking non-infringing content posted by the copyright holder, with the 
> permission of the copyright holder, in the public domain, or properly makeing 
> a fair use of copyrighted material.

I am sort of thinking this is simply not feasable. They come up with all 
these drm schemes and all seem seriously broken in bad ways,




> 

> all the best,
> 
> drew
> 




> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cc-community mailing list
> cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community



More information about the cc-community mailing list