[cc-community] Why "Wiki license" = CC-BY-SA?
Terry Hancock
hancock at anansispaceworks.com
Mon Jan 14 15:48:41 EST 2008
v111p wrote:
> Does anybody here know why Creative Commons decided that the best license
> for a wiki site is CC-BY-SA, rather than, say, CC-BY or other non-copyleft
> license? Perhaps there is an explanation somewhere?
>
> http://creativecommons.org/license/results-one?license_code=by-sa&wiki=true
A copyleft is useful for a wiki because it promotes contributions to be
made to the wiki and prohibits proprietary forking.
Consider:
Wiki licensed CC-By...
* Content can be reused for any purpose
* User decides to copy the content, add own material
and release under a proprietary license
* Result derivative cannot be copied back into wiki
(without seeking permission)
* Information gets spread over multiple proprietary
sites which cannot share and original wiki
becomes of reduced value
Wiki licensed CC-By-SA...
* Content can be reused for any purpose
* User decides to copy the content, add own material
and republish under copyleft-required CC-By-SA
* Useful material can be ported back into original wiki
by anyone
* Original wiki grows in value, regardless of how much
material is copied and expanded on other sites
* Because the original wiki is of higher utility than
forked wiki and requires no extra maintenance,
the lazy behavior is to contribute content
to the original wiki instead
Needless to say, this is only a rule of thumb. There may be mitigating
circumstances which encourage other choices. But CC-By-SA is a good
default.
Cheers,
Terry
--
Terry Hancock (hancock at AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com
More information about the cc-community
mailing list