[cc-community] Contradictory meanings of "non-commercial"?
Matthew J. Agnello
matt.agnello at gmail.com
Sun Feb 10 12:32:36 EST 2008
> But they have moral weight. Moral weight that will be brought to
> bear as a defence for selling material marked CC-BY-NC-*.
I suppose you could bribe the judge to accept your selling of NC work,
but that wouldn't really constitute a non-commercial use of the work,
either.
> Ethical conduct is a vice.
> Corrupt conduct is a virtue.
Like I said, I think you're starting to venture into territory CC
can't really cover with its licenses. And given its success thus far,
I don't think you can argue there's fundamentally anything wrong with
the system it has created for itself, moral or otherwise.
Best,
// Matt
----------
Matt Agnello
http://www.hungryfilmmaker.com
< matt.agnello at gmail.com >
On Feb 10, 2008, at 12:49 AM, jonathon wrote:
> But they have moral weight. Moral weight that will be brought to
> bear as a defence for selling material marked CC-BY-NC-*.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20080210/8a40bb2d/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20080210/8a40bb2d/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the cc-community
mailing list