[cc-community] Contradictory meanings of "non-commercial"?
Matthew J. Agnello
matt.agnello at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 02:28:13 EST 2008
> If one has no qualms about gaming the system, and doing what the
> letter of the license allows, then yes, one can commercially sell
> material with an NC license, usign the guidelines provided on the
> Creative Commons Foundation website as their justification in adhering
> to the terms of the license, with minimal legal consequences
> whatsoever.
If this could work, I assume it could only work through claiming some
sort of ignorance, and that would be a failing of general copyright
law and not CC.
// Matt
----------
Matt Agnello
http://www.hungryfilmmaker.com
< matt.agnello at gmail.com >
On Feb 8, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Andrew Rens wrote:
> If one has no qualms about gaming the system, and doing what the
> letter of the license allows, then yes, one can commercially sell
> material with an NC license, usign the guidelines provided on the
> Creative Commons Foundation website as their justification in adhering
> to the terms of the license, with minimal legal consequences
> whatsoever.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20080208/fc47bdee/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20080208/fc47bdee/attachment.bin
More information about the cc-community
mailing list