[cc-community] input for LiveContent v2.0
Asheesh Laroia
asheesh at creativecommons.org
Fri Feb 1 10:35:43 EST 2008
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Brianna Laugher wrote:
> On 01/02/2008, Asheesh Laroia <asheesh at creativecommons.org> wrote:
>>> If someone writes a final version of a spec I can make sure we output
>>> according to that.
>>
>> Okay, here's a spec for LiveContent 2.0:
>>
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/2008-January/002950.html
>>
>> Let's call that official and run with it for now.
>
> - No description field?
If you want, you can give me more fields. We don't have put in a
description field for the stuff we pull down from Flickr, but I see how it
would be useful.
> - How should dual licenses be handled?
Again, not something I had considered because the stuff from Flickr
doesn't have that. If it's as simple as "You can use this under two
licenses," I suggest doing this:
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ or
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html
That is, just list both in the same line.
> - How should copyright-expired material be handled?
Copyright: Expired (because... / reference URL)
with no License: line
It won't be extremely machine-readable, but it's good for humans I think.
-- Asheesh.
--
If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.
-- Maslow
More information about the cc-community
mailing list