[cc-community] What does NC means?

drew Roberts zotz at 100jamz.com
Sat Sep 15 23:09:44 EDT 2007


On Saturday 15 September 2007 10:14 pm, jonathon wrote:
> Milos wrote:

big snip

> >If NC is not really NC, then I may ask myself is SA really SA.
>
> "Share Alike" is defined in the CC Contract.  As such, it is fairly
> difficult to morph it into something that is non-SA.  (As a side
> effect of their policies, Youtube has morphed SA work into non-SA.
> Youtube polices are discongruent with _all_ of the Creative Commons
> Licenses.)
>

I don't know. Some things about SA surprised me. There are still changes I 
would like to see that I would consider improvements.

snip

>
> Drew wrote:

I go by drew actually and not Drew... (just a nit pick.)

> >I think that a lot more than you might at first think may be
>
> prohibited by using NC opening up users of the songbook to royalties
> and law suits.
>
> The 9 March 2006 District Court of Amsterdam case "Curry v Weekend"
> involved the CC-BY-NC-SA license.
>
> The 17 February 2006 Lower Court number six of Badajoz case "Sociedad
> General de Autores y Editores ("SGAE") v Metropol (Ricardo Andrés
> Utrera Fernández involved CC-BY-SA licenses.
>
> AFAIK, those are the only two court cases that directly involved CC
> licenses.   Had the Spanish nightclub used CC-NC material, they would
> have been liable for royalty payments.

I think that goes to my point. Thanks for the info.
>
>
> xan
>
> jonathon

all the best,

drew


More information about the cc-community mailing list