[cc-community] by-nd for software
Burobjorn
burobjorn at gmail.com
Sun Oct 21 11:01:49 EDT 2007
Actually, some Microsoft licenses are now open-source licenses (as in
approved by OSI).
See this news items by OSI:
http://opensource.org/node/207
All the best,
grtz
BjornW
Nathan Yergler wrote:
> On 10/21/07, NikNot <niknot at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10/21/07, Asheesh Laroia <asheesh at asheesh.org> wrote:
>>> Have you looked at the GNU LGPL? It seems to be a good fit for you:
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License
>>>
>>> It has the advantage of being designed for software, unlike the CC license
>>> suite.
>> Yes, GNU (and BSD) would be my logical choices; however I have a problem
>> with both in that I need to prevent the modifications and derivatives - this is
>> the main reason I'm looking for the alternatives.
>
> As Asheesh pointed out, the CC licenses aren't great for software.
> Maybe one of the Microsoft or Sun "Community" or "Reference" licenses
> (ie, http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/licensingbasics/referencelicense.mspx)?
> They aren't open source licenses (as defined/approved by OSI), but it
> doesn't sound like that's a requirement in this situation.
>
> Nathan
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cc-community mailing list
>> cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-community mailing list
> cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
>
--
met vriendelijke groet,
Bjorn Wijers
* b u r o b j o r n .nl *
digitaal vakmanschap | digital craftsmanship
Concordiastraat 68-114
3551 EM Utrecht
The Netherlands
phone: +31 30 2444 101
http://www.burobjorn.nl
More information about the cc-community
mailing list