[cc-community] Attributing when there is no name

Fred Benenson fred.benenson at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 22:47:56 EDT 2007


I'm really sorry if this comes off the wrong way, but I can't help but find
it irreverent that the person who asked about avoiding attribution of
usernames because of it not looking reputable uses the name "Complex
Confusion" as their e-mail signature.

Just my 2 cents,


F


On 10/19/07, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 20/10/2007, Complex <complex.confusion at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am using an image licensed as CC-by-SA, distributed through
> > Wikipedia Commons. Because the only name associated with the work is
> > the username (e.g. fred01), I had to write the attribution as "image
> > copyright 'fred01' licensed as CC-by-SA"  which certainly doesn't look
> > very reputable.
> >
> > Is there a standard behavior I should follow in this case?
>
> Why not "Wikimedia Commons user 'Fred01'" ?
>
> cheers,
> Brianna
>
> --
> They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment:
> http://modernthings.org/
> _______________________________________________
> cc-community mailing list
> cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20071019/608e75a2/attachment.htm 


More information about the cc-community mailing list