[cc-community] [Icommons] Boing Boing's CC licensed videocast
Jon Phillips
jon at rejon.org
Wed Oct 3 17:43:51 EDT 2007
This seems like a good discussion to have on cc-community ;)
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 14:29 +0300, Herkko Hietanen wrote:
> Alek makes a valid point!
>
> I tried to raise this issue at Harvard iSummit. I think it was the Brazilian
> team who had a video of Gil playing John Lennon's Imagine. They said that
> the performance was CC licensed. The point is that even if the performance
> is licensed, the underlying song is not. Thus if someone distributes it
> without the consent of Lennon's family they are infringers.
>
> I have not seen BoingBoings video, but if the robot segment is consider a
> quote it should be ok to license it at least with no derivatives license. A
> derivative license would enable licensees to cut the robot piece out and do
> whatever they want to which is something that licensor doesn't have a power
> to do. Using a ND license would keep intact the original use of quoting.
>
> Herkko
> cc-fi
One thing which CC worked on over the summer is to create Marking media
which can be put at the beginning of a film, audio file, etc, which
marks the CC license used...
http://creativecommons.org/projects/marking
(video markers/bumpers)
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_video_bumpers
We are hoping to factor this work into various parts of the CC site,
license chooser updates, etc...but some way to build on this would be
great...
Jon
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: icommons-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:icommons-
> >>bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Alek Tarkowski
> >>Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 1:51 PM
> >>To: icommons at lists.ibiblio.org
> >>Subject: [Icommons] Boing Boing's CC licensed videocast
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I've just read about the new CC-licensed Boing Boing TV, which made me
> >>think of best practices regarding CC licensing.
> >>
> >>The thing is, the video is made up of multiple segments, to which the
> >>rights lie either with Boing Boing creators, or with someone else. Some
> >>are public domain, some are not. There is for instance a video of a
> >>robot playing "Crazy", a song written by Willie Nelson - and some
> >>mention in the video's comments, that due credit was not given in the
> >>video itself due to an ommission.
> >>
> >>While I am sure that Boing Boing got the legal side of things right, I
> >>think it might be confusing for viewers to read that the whole work is
> >>CC-licensed. So I'm thinking what the best practice would be - list
> >>every element with its copyright status description?
> >>
> >>This might, unfortunately, quickly become very tedious - but do we have
> >>a choice?
> >>
> >> >alek.
> >>
> >>--
> >>koordynator / public lead
> >>Creative Commons Polska / Poland
> >>http://creativecommons.pl
> >>skype: alektarkowski
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Icommons mailing list
> >>Icommons at lists.ibiblio.org
> >>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/icommons
>
> _______________________________________________
> Icommons mailing list
> Icommons at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/icommons
--
Jon Phillips
San Francisco, CA
USA PH 510.499.0894
jon at rejon.org
http://www.rejon.org
MSN, AIM, Yahoo Chat: kidproto
Jabber Chat: rejon at gristle.org
IRC: rejon at irc.freenode.net
Please note: the contents of this email are not intended to be
legal advice nor should they be relied upon as or represented to be
legal advice. Jon Phillips does not represent any organization through
this email address.
More information about the cc-community
mailing list