[cc-community] Derivative of GFDL work licensable under BY-SA?
Matt Agnello
matt.agnello at gmail.com
Sat Dec 22 01:52:00 EST 2007
I'm working on making a derivative work of a verbatim audio reading of
Wikipedia's GFDL article. The audio recording, listed on the page
itself, is under the same copyright as the original page (Wikipedia's
GFDL). The derivative will be highly edited, combined with video, and
will not necessarily resemble the original at all. However, I'd like
to license the derivative under a Creative Commons BY-SA license. Is
this possible? Will I have to or should I dual-license?
Before I even begin to consider the specifics of how to implement the
GFDL in video, should I just wait until Wikipedia supports BY-SA in
some way to bother thinking about licenses?
Any insight would be appreciated.
Best,
// Matt
----------
Matt Agnello
http://www.hungryfilmmaker.com
< matt.agnello at gmail.com >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20071222/72d844e0/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20071222/72d844e0/attachment.bin
More information about the cc-community
mailing list