[cc-community] CC licenses and recording rights for music
Denver Gingerich
denver at ossguy.com
Tue Dec 18 13:53:47 EST 2007
On Dec 18, 2007 12:19 AM, jonathon <jonathon.blake at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007 2:07 AM, Denver Gingerich wrote:
>
> >Since the church is not making a public performance of the music
> (perhaps it is; see below)
>
> Over the last decade, the trend is to consider a congregation singing
> a hymn as a "public performance' for which royalties are to be paid.
I would be interested in hearing a bit more about this, particularly
examples (such as case law or new licenses of this type that have
recently become available) where this trend can be seen.
> > I think the assumption I'm making is that a church's performance of a song does not count as a "public performance". See the above discussion.
>
> If there is a performance by a group other than the general
> congregation, then it is a public performance, no ifs, ands, or buts.
> (EG: A church choir is a performance. A soloist is a performance.)
> The only gray area might be whether or not the congregation, as a
> whole, singing a hymn is a "public performance".
After doing some more research and finding a page dealing specifically
with copyright pertaining to churches [1], I see that there are
specific exemptions in US and Canadian law for public performances "of
a religious nature" or by a "religious organization" [2] [3]. I think
this makes the question of whether a church service is considered a
public performance a moot point.
I should have found this stuff earlier; it would have saved us some
needless discussion here.
> > Licensing companies tend to not address the case where music is sung in church but no lyrics or music are copied suggesting they don't believe it is enforceable.
>
> Different collecting societies collect royalties for different things.
> * Harris Fox Agency handles mechanical recording rights;
> * ASCAP, BMI, SESAC handle performing rights;
> * CCLI handles hardcopy copying rights for some Christian groups;
> This is by no means all of the collecting societies that one might
> have to deal with.
Depending on what the church is doing, that's right. The Willow Creek
Association has an interesting article on which licenses a church
might need [4].
> Thus far, ASCAP, SESAC, and BMI are making a good business out of
> forcing clubs to abandon live music. Once they have completely killed
> the live music nightclub scene, they will atack churches with a
> vengance.
Given the exemptions discussed above, I don't think that will happen.
> For a church to not have to pay royalties the only material that can
> be legally used is "public domain".
Or music where artists have given explicit permission for royalty-free
copying. There are several sites out there that host such music.
These include ShareSong.org and 4praise.com. There are also personal
sites such as Larry Holder's that have CC-like licenses for hosted
music (see http://www.larryholdermusic.org/copyright.html).
There are also resources out there for public domain material. For
those interested, I would highly suggest checking out the Open Hymnal
Project (http://openhymnal.org/) or HymnWiki
(http://www.hymnwiki.org/).
> (For technical legal reasons, none
> of the CC licenses allow the creator of the work to waive collection
> of royalty payments.)
Do you mean collection of royalty payments for recordings and public
performance?
> ###
>
> One possibility would be to find a couple of hymnals that were printed
> prior to 1920, and reprint them using Lulu.com. The downside is that
> they will wholesale for at least US$30.00 per copy, or roughly four
> times the current retail cost of pew hymnals. :( [From browsing
> iUniverse and CafePress, it looks like they retail price would be
> about the same.]
Or print songs from some of the web sites listed above. The person
running the Open Hymnal Project uses mainly songs from pre-1923
hymnals so they are guaranteed to be in the public domain in the
United States.
Denver
1. http://www.pastors.com/rwmt/article.asp?ArtID=10256
2. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Code/Title_17/Chapter_1/Section_110
- see subsection (3)
3. http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/info/act-e.html#32.2 - see subsection (3)
4. http://www.willowcreek.com/wcanews/story.asp?id=WN06I22006
More information about the cc-community
mailing list