[cc-community] An easy way to notify licensors about new license versions
Evan Prodromou
evan at prodromou.name
Sun Dec 9 21:27:45 EST 2007
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 20:58 -0500, drew Roberts wrote:
> With dual licenses, I see it as easy because I would point to the other
> license and say I am not using this one at all.
>
> However, if I am trying to use this one with modifications that are not
> mutually agreed upon and in writing, then I would think that "This License
> constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the Work
> licensed here." might kick in and prevent that.
>
> I couldn't say I am not using this license but another one. Or what? Plus, in
> the case of SA licenses, wouldn't modifications make mixing works with mods
> and no mods or different mods not possible?
>
> I am happy to be wrong here, I would just like to understand things better if
> so.
I see your point -- you're considering Attribution 2.5 and Attribution
3.0 not as separate licenses, but as an object that has been modified in
the 3.0 version.
I think that it's probably OK to say that you're dual-licensing the work
under Attribution 1.0, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0, for example.
-Evan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2738 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20071209/05582ab4/attachment.bin
More information about the cc-community
mailing list