[cc-community] Orlowski vs. liblicense
Jon Phillips
jon at creativecommons.org
Mon Aug 20 13:40:49 EDT 2007
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 10:12 -0700, Jon Phillips wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 16:14 +0100, rob at robmyers.org wrote:
> > Andrew "please give me an interview Larry, pleeease!"* Orlowski has
> > his sights on liblicense, the CC licensing module being used in OLPC:
> >
> > "The music industry has a long and shameful history of robbing black
> > artists of their rights. Now along comes some new software that will
> > help speed up the job. Think of it as a sort of 1-Click "non-payment"
> > system."
> >
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/20/one_click_colonialism/
> >
> > As usual, Orlowski's article is deliberately inflamatory linkbait. I'd
> > link to the Google cache but El Reg need their page views so there
> > isn't one.
> >
> > That said, I'm sure that more grown up versions of this objection will
> > be aired. And I think they will deserve answering.
> >
> > - Rob.
> >
> > * - Speech marks do not indicate literal quote.
> >
>
> Thanks Rob!
>
> Anyway, we have been chugging along with liblicense development this
> summer and had planned to put a change like this into the system once it
> matured.
>
> In fact, the next release of liblicense will in fact have this feature
> of no license or set license, so that when it is installed, will be set
> to no license on olpc or anywhere you install liblicense. This is
> planned to come out this week.
Let me clarify (thanks scott), liblicense allows for one to both set (or
not set) a default license on a system like OLPC, Gnome or KDE, and/or
allow for per-content-item selection or no lack thereof, depending on
what a user of a system selects. The point is, it is up to the user, as
this change further emphasizes. And, what I'm saying above is that by
default, no license is selected.
Jon
> We have rolled out a similar feature on another license chooser along
> the same lines to take into account community views and also various
> parties who want to use it...
>
> NOTE: This is another case where journalists *should* check with those
> they are talking at and about in order to do accurate reporting.
>
> Thanks for bringing this up!
>
> Cheers!
>
> Jon
>
--
Jon Phillips
jon at creativecommons.org
cell: +1.510.499.0894 (80% time)
desk: +1.415.369.8486 (20% time)
Community/Business Developer
Creative Commons
www.creativecommons.org
Please note: the contents of this email are not intended to be
legal advice nor should they be relied upon as or represented to be
legal advice. Creative Commons cannot and does not give legal advice.
You need to assess the suitability of Creative Commons' tools for
your particular situation, which may include obtaining appropriate
legal advice from a licensed attorney.
More information about the cc-community
mailing list