[cc-community] CC licenses for music: PA vs. SR?
Eric Steuer
eric at creativecommons.org
Tue Aug 7 11:47:03 EDT 2007
Very cool news.
The sort of agreement you've outlined is very common and 100% sensible.
WKNC should have no problem using NC music.
Keep us posted!
Eric
==
Eric Steuer
Creative Director, Creative Commons
eric at creativecommons.org
On Aug 7, 2007, at 7:21 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
>
> So here's the situation. We've got a local radio station here in
> Raleigh,
> WKNC. It's affiliated with N.C. State University, and it's a
> registered
> non-profit. It's student run, no commercials, lots of PSAs, etc.,
> etc.
>
> They are taking an active interest in CC licensed music. Their music
> director has been walking through the Jamendo catalogue, and they are
> pretty psyched. All good news.
>
> In fact, they are now looking to get a bunch of local musicians
> together
> to jam out on a series of live broadcasts, and they're trying to
> convince
> the artists to release the resultant performances under a Creative
> Commons
> license. Probably NC-ND.
>
> The likely agreement: we will ask the artists to license the live
> recordings of their works (the SR copyright) under a Creative Commons
> NC-ND license, but we will NOT ask them to license the underlying
> composition (the PA copyright) at all. Is this kind of agreement
> common?
> Sensible? We're trying to encourage the artists to share particular
> recordings without giving away the farm.
>
> Also -- I'm assuming that WKNC's not-for-profit status allows them to
> rebroadcast works that are licensed NC. Is this correct?
>
> --g
>
> --
> Greg DeKoenigsberg
> Community Development Manager
> Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
> "To whomsoever much hath been given...
> ...from him much shall be asked"
> _______________________________________________
> cc-community mailing list
> cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
More information about the cc-community
mailing list