[Biblical-languages] Diff. in Unicode handling of Gk vs. Heb?

John Baima jbaima at silvermnt.com
Fri Oct 17 08:02:25 EDT 2003


>
>1. *Why* is Hebrew handled differently in Unicode than the recommended way
>of doing Greek? That is (if I understand things correctly), the recommended
>way to do Greek is to use precomposed forms for letters with diacritics (the
>Greek Extended range),


BTW, if you do this and use Access or SQL Server, they do not index the 
Greek Extended range properly. Access and SQL Server ignore characters in 
the Greek Extended range.



_________
John Baima
Silver Mountain Software 1029 Tanglewood Dr, Cedar Hill TX 75104-3019
jbaima at silvermnt.com        http://www.silvermnt.com
Fax 972 293-6641   Voice 972 293-2921




More information about the Biblical-languages mailing list