[Biblical-languages] Hebrew with Aramaic,
Phoenician etc in scholarly publications
Peter Kirk
peter.r.kirk at ntlworld.com
Wed Jul 16 07:00:42 EDT 2003
On 16/07/2003 05:10, Karljürgen Feuerherm wrote:
>I would expect that to be the major legitimzing issue. I can't speak for
>what is presently in journals, but from a theoretical standpoint, one should
>consider the ease with with a scholar might write on the development, for
>example, of those writing systems and wish to integrate various ones in one
>monograph.
>
Within reason, I'm sure. But we can't expect every minor development to
have a different Unicode block. If an author wants to write e.g. "In 6th
century Damascus the shape of aleph was ... but in 5th century Palmyra
it was ... , note that the descender is a little longer", then the
author is going to have to use images, or possibly font changes.
--
Peter Kirk
peter.r.kirk at ntlworld.com
http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/
More information about the Biblical-languages
mailing list