[BL] [maybe OT] new busybox 1.4.1 binary
keesan at sdf.lonestar.org
Sun Feb 25 12:59:01 EST 2007
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 3aoo-cvfd at dea.spamcon.org wrote:
> sindi keesan wrote:
>> He is also compiling a half-size current uclibc.
> Which kernel includes is he using for the compile?
> In order to work reliably with a 2.2 kernel, uclibc
> needs to be compiled with 2.2 kernel includes.
Will executables compiled with uclibc which was compiled with kernel 2.4
includes still work with kernel 2.2? I sort of recall some problems using
my latest busybox with 2.2.16. The BL3 one works with 2.2 and 2.4.
It would not be difficult to boot with 2.4.31 before chrooting to uclibc.
Anyone with too little RAM for the larger kernel probably would not be
compiling with uclibc anyway.
More information about the BasLinux