ariadne at earthlink.com.au
Sat Sep 18 18:36:12 EDT 2004
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:48:41 +1200
3aoo-cvfd at dea.spamcon.org wrote:
> Ron Clarke wrote:
> > I am getting the impression that there will be more
> > and more applications (over time) that will run in
> > BL3, so maybe an even larger fs.img may be better
> Since users have the option of installing BL3 to its own
> partition, I see no need to make fs.img large enough for
> lots of add-ons. However, I think it would be good if
> fs.img was large enough to install one add-on (even the
> biggest one).
I guess I would agree with that. :)
And now that I have your routine for making fs.img bigger, not having
a spare partition is no longer a problem for me.
Is there a limit to the size of fs.img, apart from constraints imposed by
available RAM ?
AUSREG Consultancy http://www.valylink.net.au/~ausreg/index.html
Tadpole Tunes http://tadpole.mytunebook.de/
This mail sent to you from sylpheed running on penguin-power
More information about the BasLinux