[b-hebrew] barak (bless? curse?) in the Book of Job

John Estell oldearther at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 29 11:23:50 EST 2009


Karl,

"But outside of slang where thereis a deliberate attempt at obfuscation, no where is that semantic range so
broad that a word can have one meaning and its opposite."
 
What about olam (and in Greek, aion/aionios) ?  Can't that refer to both time and eternity?  Aren't these opposite meanings?
 
John Estell




________________________________
From: K Randolph <kwrandolph at gmail.com>
To: "b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org" <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 2:09:45 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] barak (bless? curse?) in the Book of Job

John:

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:24 PM, John Estell <oldearther at yahoo.com> wrote:

> "*The functional meaning of a word does not change from context to
> context.*"
>
> Maybe I don't know what you mean by "functional meaning", but when a word
> has different meanings, then context determines what meaning is in view.
>

Yes and no. Words have what I call a "semantic range", some with a wide
range of meaning, some with a narrow one. But outside of slang where there
is a deliberate attempt at obfuscation, no where is that semantic range so
broad that a word can have one meaning and its opposite. I have seen no
evidence that such slang was ever used in the Bible, have you?

For words that have a broad semantic range, the context can indicate where
within that semantic range the understanding may lie, and in translation,
which is the best word to use in the target language, but it cannot change a
word's meaning.


>  If BRK is indeed used euphemistically to mean something like "renounce"
> or "blaspheme", then your criticism does not apply.
>
>
That's just my point, I see no evidence that it is used euphemistically to
indicate the opposite of its meaning. I have no problem with euphemisms in
the Bible, one of the more common being )BD meaning to become lost, being
used as a euphemism for to die ("He is lost to us"). Furthermore, many words
are used semi-poetically, even in prose texts. But euphemisms do not have
the opposite of a word's regular meaning, and in the context of these verses
in Job, even the contexts indicate that such a euphemism is not necessary.


> Great discussion, fellas.
>
> John Estell
>
>
Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew



      


More information about the b-hebrew mailing list