[b-hebrew] "Shinar" at Genesis 14: 1 Is Not "Sumer", Part I
Isaac Fried
if at math.bu.edu
Sun Feb 3 07:55:06 EST 2008
The "midrash" was possibly seeing $IN(AR as consisting of $IN, 'two,
different' and (AR 'river', Y)OR or NAHAR. Thus $IN(AR = the land of
the $NEI Y)OR-IM. Another midrash may see (AR as standing for (IR, )
UR, 'city, people, throng'. Still another midrash may see $IN as
standing for 'tooth' and (AR being a contracted HAR, 'mountain',
ect., ect. Likewise for the -er of Sumer, the land of the big, (ACUM,
Aryans.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Feb 3, 2008, at 2:45 AM, Yigal Levin wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shoshanna Walker" <rosewalk at concentric.net>
>
>
>> Shinar is Babylon
>
> Probably correct in a general sense, but on what do you base this
> statement?
>
>>
>> The Midrash identifies Chedorlaomer as Elom son of Shem son of Noah
>>
> Which Midrash? Do you have a source?
>
> You really should read Maharal on midrashim.
>
>
>
>> Shoshanna
>
> And please remember to use your full name.
>
> Yigal Levin
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
More information about the b-hebrew
mailing list