[b-hebrew] repost of full question
Bryant J. Williams III
bjwvmw at com-pair.net
Mon Apr 21 11:50:16 EDT 2008
Dear Dirk, Harold, et al,
I would probably add that since the Second Temple was completed until ca. 517,
then the completion of the desolation of Jerusalem would be finished at that
time.
Here is an example where the physical desolation began in 605 BC and ended in
535 BC, but the spiritual desolation, represented by the destruction of the
Temple did not begin until 587-6 BC and ended 70 years later in 517-6 BC upon
its rebuilding. This is one of the reasons why Haggai and Zechariah prophesied
in the first place.
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harold Holmyard" <hholmyard3 at earthlink.net>
To: "b-hebrew-lists.ibiblio.org" <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] repost of full question
> Dirk,
> > Harold,
> >
> > My appologies for that last email. I must have hit a wrong shortcut combo on
my keyboard by accident and it sent an incomplete response. Sorry :).
> >
> > I am glad you are starting to see what I am saying. However, let me say a
few more words.
> >
> > I'm not looking for help in Daniel 9:2 for this theory. I am looking for
consistency. I see most Bibles render Daniel 9:2 in such a way that it leaves
the sense of relating the END of the 70 years with END of devastations of
Jerusalem. But some Bibles equate them. I am taking issue with the Bibles that
equate them because they don't match a plain reading of Jeremiah, and they do
not match history very well.
> >
>
> HH: I think that so many Bibles say that the desolations of Jerusalem
> last 70 years because that is what Daniel meant. There are parallel
> passages to support this:
>
> Zechariah 7:5 "Say to all the people of the land and to the priests,
> 'When you fasted and mourned in the fifth and seventh months these
> seventy years, was it actually for Me that you fasted?
>
> 2Chr. 36:20 He took into exile in Babylon those who had escaped from the
> sword, and they became servants to him and to his sons until the
> establishment of the kingdom of Persia,
> 2Chr. 36:21 to fulfill the word of the LORD by the mouth of Jeremiah,
> until the land had made up for its sabbaths. All the days that it lay
> desolate it kept sabbath, to fulfill seventy years.
>
> HH: These are important passages showing that Israel's punishment lasted
> 70 years.
>
> HH: Here's Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary:
>
> 9:1-3 Daniel learned from the books of the prophets, especially from
> Jeremiah, that the desolation of Jerusalem would continue seventy years,
> which were drawing to a close. God's promises are to encourage our
> prayers, not to make them needless; and when we see the performance of
> them approaching, we should more earnestly plead them with God.
>
> HH: Here is John MacArthur writing on these passages:
> http://www.biblebb.com/files/mac/sg27-24.htm
>
> The inhabitants of southern kingdom of Judah were later taken captive
> by the Babylonians--the first of four great Gentile world empires:
> Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome (cf. Dan. 7:1-8). That captivity
> began about 605 B. C. when King Nebuchadnezzar started what became a
> series of three significant deportations from Judah. In the first
> deportation Nebuchadnezzer carried away the young men from among the
> nobles and princes of Judah. Among them were four young men named
> Daniel, Mishael, Hananiah, and Azariah. The Babylonians renamed them
> Belteshazzar, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego (Dan. 1:6-7). Although a
> captive, Daniel remained fully committed to the God of Israel. As a
> result of his commitment and the quality of his character he eventually
> became the prime minister of Babylon.
>
> At the time the prophecy recorded in Daniel 9 was given, the Babylonian
> Empire had fallen to the Medo-Persian Empire. A king named Cyrus (also
> titled Darius) was in power. Although the Jewish exiles were now the
> captives of the Medo-Persians, Daniel retained his position as prime
> minister because of his integrity. Some scholars believe Daniel received
> his revelation in the year 537 B. C., which was just about seventy
> years after Daniel had been taken captive.
>
> B. The Concern of Daniel
>
> That seventy year mark was important to Daniel: "I . . . understood by
> books the number of the years, concerning which the word of the Lord
> came to Jeremiah, the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years
> in the desolations of Jerusalem" (Dan. 9:2). Jeremiah prophesied that
> the people from Judah would be in captivity for seventy years (Jer.
> 25:11; 29:10). Daniel knew that if the seventy year period began with
> the first deportation, it was nearly over (though he didn't know if the
> seventy years dated from 605, 597, or 586 B. C. --the years of the
> three significant deportations).
>
> HH: Keil's older commentary says that the wording in Dan 9:2 depends on
> Jer 25:12, not 29:10. He says that Jerusalem did not certainly lie in
> ruins for seventy years; the word is not thus to be interpreted, but is
> chosen partly with regard to the existing state of Jerusalem, and partly
> with reference to the words of Jer 25:9, 11. Yet the desolation began
> wih the first taking of Jerusalem, and the deportation of Daniel and his
> companions and a part of the sacred vessels of the temple, in the fourth
> year of Jehoiakim (606 B.C.).
>
> HH: Keil speaks specifically of the "seventy years of exile" for Israel,
> and so do most Bible
> scholars.
>
> Yours,
> Harold Holmyard
>
> > Whether Jeremiah and Daniel were written down before or after the events
they describe is irrelevant to me. What I would like to see (hopefully) is
Daniel, who cites Jeremiah, agree with the scriptures in Jeremiah, and at the
same time reflect historical accuracy. (I need to say some things about
historical accuracy, but K. Randolph has responded to this email post citing
historical accuracy, so I will do it there) So when I cite Daniel 9:2 from the
NIV (and some of the translations you cited), I am saying that I think something
was left out of the translation - mainly the thought of "fulfillment" of the
desolations being tied to the end of the 70 years. When this thought is
included, it changes the meaning of the scripture to one that definitely agrees
with Jeremiah.
> >
> > Take for example one of the translations you cited - the New Living
Translation. It reads:
> >
> > 2 During the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, learned from reading
> > the word of the Lord, as revealed to Jeremiah the prophet, that
> > Jerusalem **must lie desolate for seventy years.**
> >
> > This is an example of Daniel 9:2 that I find hard to accept. Why? Because
Jerusalem was desolated in 587. The Jews returned in 538/537. This is 50 years.
Jeremiah could be stating a round number/estimate, but that's 20 years off. It
doesn't agree with history.
> >
> > You also cited the Holman Christian Standard Bible:
> >
> > 2 in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the books
> > according to the word of the LORD to Jeremiah the prophet that the
> > number of **years for the desolation of Jerusalem would be 70.**
> >
> > This poses the same problem. It flat out equates says that Jerusalem's
desolation would be 70 years. Now, with this version of Daniel 9:2, you may be
able to get around it. The way you would do that is by saying the word rendered
"desolation" didn't mean complete desolation. Rather, it meant partial
desolation, perhaps when the Babylonians first came up against Jerusalem in the
4th year of Jehoiakim, which is around 606/605. I have no problem with this
interpretation of "desolation". But I might add, that it essentially re-defines
"desolation" to mean something more like "servitude". After all, it describes a
situation where Babylon comes against Jerusalem in the 4th year of Jehoiakim,
does a little damage, subjugates the nation, and then leaves. Like you said in
your first response, "How desolated does it have to be to be desolated?" This is
the same thing as a vassal - which is what I am saying. Notice, you can't really
do that with the New Living
> > Translations' version of Daniel 9:2 because it doesn't give you the liberty
of redefining "desolation", mainly because of the word "lie" inserted in the
verse. In any case, if you take this route then you have to assume 70 is a round
number. From 606/605 to 538/537, is approx 69 years. REALLY CLOSE. So I can see
the argument being that it is a round number. In this case it would make sense.
> >
> > Just for a second, take a look at it from an interlinear:
> >
> > "in year of one to reign of him I Daniel understood in scrolls number of
the years which became word of Yahweh to Jeremiah the prophet to fulfill of
desertions of Jereusalem seventy year."
> >
> > The Hebrew word rendered fulfill is strong number H4390. Here is the
definition (I am pasting it, and I'm not sure if the Hebrew characters will go
through on the mailing list):
> >
> > H4390
> > מלא מלא
> > mâlê' mâlâ'
> > maw-lay', maw-law'
> > A primitive root, to fill or (intransitively) be full of, in a wide
application (literally and figuratively): - accomplish, confirm, + consecrate,
be at an end, be expired, be fenced, fill, fulfil, (be, become, X draw, give in,
go) fully (-ly, -ly set, tale), [over-] flow, fulness, furnish, gather (selves,
together), presume, replenish, satisfy, set, space, take a [hand-] full, + have
wholly.
> >
> > There is a clear reference to the end of the period, its completion, its
accomplishment. I will paraphrase - 'I understood from the word of Yahweh
through Jeremiah the prophet that it would be seventy years before the
desolation would be fulfilled (brought to and end, completed, accomplished,
etc.)'. This sense avoids any equation of the 70 years with the desolations and
simply states, when the 70 years ended, the desolations could now end.
> >
> > And this is what I am getting at - if it is read that way (with the sense of
strong number H4390 left in the verse), it does not contradict Jeremiah or
history. Yes, Jeremiah states that Jerusalem would be desolate. But the seventy
years was to be measured by way of servitude of many nations toward Babylon -
Jeremiah 29:10 says "for Babylon".
> >
> > I think the context of Daniel 9 also supports this. Remember the order of
events I was speaking of earlier. That order is expressed clearly in Jeremiah
25:12 and Jeremiah 29:10-13.
> >
> > If we accept this statement: "Jerusalem would lie desolate 70 years.", then
we natually have to discard our historical evidence - which is pretty massive.
> >
> >
> > See what I mean? I would like it all to agree.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Harold Holmyard <hholmyard3 at earthlink.net>
> > To: b-hebrew-lists.ibiblio.org <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
> > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 5:35:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] repost of full question
> >
> > Dirk,
> >
> > O.K., I understand your theory, but I don't think you get much help from
> > Dan 9:2. Some translations don't use idiomatic English. Here is the
> > Holman Christian Standard Bible:
> >
> > 2 in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the books
> > according to the word of the LORD to Jeremiah the prophet that the
> > number of years for the desolation of Jerusalem would be 70.
> >
> > HH: Here is the New Living Translation (NLT):
> >
> > 2 During the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, learned from reading
> > the word of the Lord, as revealed to Jeremiah the prophet, that
> > Jerusalem must lie desolate for seventy years.
> >
> > HH: Here is the New Century Version:
> >
> > 2 During Darius' first year as king, I, Daniel, was reading the
> > Scriptures. I saw that the Lord told Jeremiah that Jerusalem would be
> > empty ruins for seventy years.
> >
> > HH: Here is the Message:
> >
> > In the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, was meditating on the
> > Scriptures that gave, according to the Word of God to the prophet
> > Jeremiah, the number of years that Jerusalem had to lie in ruins,
> > namely, seventy.
> >
> > HH: Here is the New American Bible (NAB):
> >
> > 2 in the first year of his reign I, Daniel, tried to understand in the
> > Scriptures the counting of the years of which the LORD spoke to the
> > prophet Jeremiah: that for the ruins of Jerusalem seventy years must be
> > fulfilled.
> >
> > HH: Daniel's prophecy of 490 years for Israel (70 7's) is based on the
> > earlier prophecy of 70 years for Israel? To make the 70 years not
> > necessarily relevant for Israel would make the 490 years not necessarily
> > so, but they are clearly all about Israel.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Harold Holmyard
> >
> >
> >
> >> Thanks for responding again!
> >>
> >> Sorry, I'm not good at going through the emails and quoting, so I'll just
quote up here.
> >>
> >> You said: "HH: Isn't that what NIV is saying: the end of the desolations
correspond to the end of the 70 years?"
> >>
> >> If it were saying that, then I wouldn't have an issue. I am saying it looks
like Daniel 9:2 is saying, when "fulfill" is left in the scripture, that the end
of the 70 years would bring an end of the desolations, BUT that's it. Not an
equating of the two time periods. Not saying that Jerusalem would lie in ruins
for 70 years, just that the end of one period would, by consequense, bring the
end of the other period. Let's just say (for the sake of argument/illustration)
that Babylon destroyed Jerusalem in, say, 549 - 10 years before Babylon itself
fell to the Persians. So Jerusalem would be desolate only 10 years (maybe a
little longer if you factor in the trip from Babylon back to Jerusalem). In this
case, I would still say that Jeremiah was right. Even though Jerusalem was lying
desolate - paying off its sabbaths as 2 Chronicles 36:21 says, for only 10
years, the **servitude** of the **many nations** to Babylon would have started
long ago - when it
> >> started conquering to make vassal states out of the nations. I would even
argue that the servitude of the many nations started before Jerusalem was made a
vassal, since Assyria was take in 609. The focus in Jeremiah seems pointed
toward Babylon and its reign over the nations.
> >>
> >> Yes, I agree, Judah was one of those nations. And it did become desolated,
as Jeremiah states. But I don't see where the seventy years is equated with the
desolations of Jerusalem - it seems to only be equated to the "servitude" of all
the "nations round about" (Jer 25:9).
> >>
> >> Here is Jeremiah 25:11 from the KJV:
> >>
> >> "And this whole land shall be a desolation, and an astonishment; and these
nations shall serve the king of Babylon seventy years."
> >> Because it is essentially two sentences here, I see:
> >> 1) "this whole land" will become a desolation - happened in 587
> >> 2) "these nations" will "serve" the king of Babylon 70 years.
> >>
> >> The two halves of the sentence - at least in every English Bible that I've
seen - renders them as two separate thoughts, with the 70 years only attaching
to the servitude.
> >>
> >> UNLESS there is some different way to read it in HEBREW - which is why I am
posting to this mailing list.
> >>
> >> Here is the NIV of Daniel 9:2-
> >> in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the Scriptures,
according to the word of the LORD given to Jeremiah the prophet, that the
****desolation of Jerusalem would last seventy years****.
> >>
> >> It looks like it is saying "desolations = 70 years". I am saying
"desolations = 50 years" (587/exile - 537/retrurn), but the SERVITUDE of "these
nations" = 70 years, as Jeremiah states.
> >>
> >> They were not all subjucated at once, for sure, but from the start of the
Babylon's reign up until its reign ended would be 70 years. You could round it
if you like. If it makes you uncomfortable to say its an exact 70 years. It
doesn't matter to me, I am just arguing from the grammar I see in BOTH places in
Jeremiah, that the 70 years applies to Babylon's reign.
> >>
> >> I guess another way to put it is, the 70 years applies to the years of
Babylon's reign, but the desolations of Jerusalem is a sub-set of that.
> >>
> >> Here is Daniel 9:2 from the Engish Standard Version:
> >>
> >> in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, perceived in the books the
number of years that, according to the word of the LORD to Jeremiah the prophet,
**must pass before the end of the desolations of Jerusalem**, namely, seventy
years.
> >>
> >> Notice that in this version it is not equating the two, only that when the
70 years end, then it would free the way for the desolations to end, regardless
of how long Jerusalem was lying desolate.
> >>
> >> Here is Daniel 9:2 from the American Standard Version:
> >>
> >> in the first year of his reign I, Daniel, understood by the books the
number of the years whereof the word of Jehovah came to Jeremiah the prophet,
**for the accomplishing of the desolations of Jerusalem**, even seventy years.
> >>
> >> Same thought. And yet you find other versions that do this (Contemporary
English Version):
> >>
> >> Some years later, Darius the Mede, who was the son of Xerxes, had become
king of Babylonia. And during his first year as king, I found out from studying
the writings of the prophets that the LORD had said to Jeremiah, " Jerusalem
will lie in ruins for seventy years."
> >>
> >> Now, there is nothing in Daniel 9:2 about Xerxes when checking the
interlinear. So this is definitely adding a bit of info and paraphrasing a bit.
But it agrees with the NIV to equate Jerusalem's "ruins" with the 70 years.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Harold Holmyard <hholmyard3 at earthlink.net>
> >> To: b-hebrew-lists.ibiblio.org <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 3:06:43 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] repost of full question
> >>
> >> Dirk,
> >>
> >>
> >>> Thanks for responding!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The question regarding Daniel 9:2 is closely related to the questions I
had from Jeremiah because Daniel makes SPECIFIC reference that he got his
information from Jeremiah. To me, it seems very important to take that into
consideration when trying to figure out what exactly Daniel meant when he wrote
chapter 9, verse 2.
> >>>
> >>> Which is the main reason why I was also stated the two initial quesitions
regarding the grammar of Jeremiah 25:11 and Jeremiah 29:10. I don't know Hebrew,
which is why I am posting to this list.
> >>>
> >>> Here is what I mean in summary:
> >>> ALL of the Bibles that I have ever seen - ALL of them render Jeremiah
25:11 (the very first reference to the 70 years prophecy in the Bible) as a two
part thought. That is, some of them render it as a compound sentence joined with
", and"; however, most render it with a semicolon or a period. It doesn't matter
how you do it, they all mean that there are two separate thoughts expressed.
I've gotten ahold of one Hebraist, and he said that there are clearly two
thoughts there even in Hebrew - which makes sense because every Bible renders it
as two separate thoughts. This means grammatically the seventy years attaches to
the "servitude" not the "desolations".
> >>> Most Bibles render Jeremiah 29:10 (except maybe 2 or 3) as "for Babylon".
Some of them even render it as possessive - "Babylon's seventy years"
> >>> So when I read Jeremiah 25:11 and Jeremiah 29:10, grammatically speaking,
Jeremiah NEVER equates the 70 years with Jerusalem's desolations.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: But he does equate the 70 years with Jerusalem's desolations because
> >> Israel is one of these nations:
> >>
> >> Jer. 25:17 So I took the cup from the LORD’S hand, and made all the
> >> nations to whom the LORD sent me drink it:
> >> Jer. 25:18 Jerusalem and the towns of Judah, its kings and officials, to
> >> make them a desolation and a waste, an object of hissing and of cursing,
> >> as they are today;
> >> Jer. 25:19 Pharaoh king of Egypt, his servants, his officials, and all
> >> his people;
> >> Jer. 25:20 all the mixed people; all the kings of the land of Uz; all
> >> the kings of the land of the Philistines—Ashkelon, Gaza, Ekron, and the
> >> remnant of Ashdod;
> >> Jer. 25:21 Edom, Moab, and the Ammonites;
> >> Jer. 25:22 all the kings of Tyre, all the kings of Sidon, and the kings
> >> of the coastland across the sea;
> >> Jer. 25:23 Dedan, Tema, Buz, and all who have shaven temples;
> >> Jer. 25:24 all the kings of Arabia and all the kings of the mixed
> >> peoples that live in the desert;
> >> Jer. 25:25 all the kings of Zimri, all the kings of Elam, and all the
> >> kings of Media;
> >> Jer. 25:26 all the kings of the north, far and near, one after another,
> >> and all the kingdoms of the world that are on the face of the earth. And
> >> after them the king of Sheshach shall drink.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> The emphasis is always on Babylon. In Jeremiah 25 it is seventy years of
"servitude" for "these nations" (plural).
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: Yes, and Israel is the first nation mentioned in the list of the
> >> nations.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> In Jeremiah 29:10 it is seventy years "for Babylon" - putting emphasis on
Babylon's supremacy. Honestly, Daniel may not have even had Jeremiah 25. He was
exiled as part of the first wave (Daniel 1:1), as you had noted. So he may have
only had Jeremiah 29 - which was a letter to the exiles. But even if we assume
he read what was later to became Jeremiah 25, then IT STILL points to servitude
for "these nations" and seventy years "for Babylon". Nothing that I have read
specifically attaches the desolations of Jerusalem with the 70 years, IN
JEREMIAH.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: Israel was one of "these nations."
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Now when I read the NIV translating Daniel as saying the 70 years =
desolations of Jerusalem, I am confused because he specifically references
Jeremiah.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: But Jeremiah implies what he says.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Let's come at it another way. This is another dimension to it that is
confusing to me. When Daniel wrote chapter 9, the Jews were still in Jerusalem.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: You mean they were still in Babylon.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> They had not been released yet - that's the whole reason for his prayer
in chapter 9. Daniel has just witnessed the end of the Babylonian empire in
chapter 5. If you go back to Jeremiah chapter 25, read verse 12, and then go
back to Jeremiah 29 and read the verses after verse 10, there was an order that
was to be followed - a clear sequence of events.
> >>>
> >>> FIRST the 70 years would end
> >>> THEN Babylon would be called to account
> >>> THEN the Jews would return to God - with repentence, fasting, etc.
> >>> THEN the Jews would return to their land
> >>> At the time Daniel wrote the prayer recored in chapter 9, the Jews were on
step #3 - remember Babylon was called to account in ch. 5.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: O.K., but prophecies are not necessarily limited to the period to
> >> which they seem to address. Jeremiah 29:11-14 can refer to the return
> >> from Babylon in the sixth century but can also apply to eschatology. The
> >> basic promise is that God would bring them back.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> It is interesting that Daniel set out to do exactly what came next on the
list of event - repent and pray to God. The Jews were on step #3, NOT step 4.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: O.K.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> That would come a few years later when they got back to their land. Until
then, it would remain desolated. But look, step #1 was the 70 years ending. So
the 70 years ended at least 2-3 years before the desolations did. How can they
be the same period?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: This seems overly detailed. As I said in my last post, the 70 years
> >> can be a round number.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> See what I mean?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> HH: Yes, I see what you mean, but it doesn't seem a problem. God can
> >> give a general figure.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> That is why I am having such a hard time with the NIV. Now if you look at
an interlinear for Daniel 9:2, you'll notice the word rendered "fulfill",
"complete", "accomplish" is strong number H4390. I've looked it up in a Hebrew
dictionary and it definitely means "bring to and end" - "accomplish" -
"fulfill". I may not know Hebrew, but words are words because they have meaning.
And unless Jeremiah was using some sort of idiom, then the NIV left out any
sense of the word rendered "fulfill".
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: If the number of years to be fulfilled for the desolations of
> >> Jerusalem were seventy years, then the desolations would last 70 years.
> >> I don't see the problem.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> When the word is included, it brings the readers attention to the end of
the desolations corresponding to the end of the 70 years. Now THAT matches the
order set forth in Jeremiah.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: Isn't that what NIV is saying: the end of the desolations correspond
> >> to the end of the 70 years?
> >>
> >>
> >>> Just a side note. The seventy years could be a round. However, it is not
necessary. If you take Jeremiah at face value - as 70 years of servitude for
"these nations" to the "king of Babylon", then you can start with the full
conquering of the Babylonian empire in 609 BC.... 609-539 = 70 years exactly.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> HH: Fine.
> >>
> >> Yours,
> >> Harold Holmyard
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> b-hebrew mailing list
> >> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> >> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> >>
> >>
> >>
________________________________________________________________________________
____
> >> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> >> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > b-hebrew mailing list
> > b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> >
> >
> >
________________________________________________________________________________
____
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and
> > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.23.2/1388 - Release Date: 04/20/08 3:01
PM
For your security this Message has been checked for Viruses as a courtesy of Com-Pair Services!
More information about the b-hebrew
mailing list