[b-hebrew] resource material was chalal-perforate/pierce?
Isaac Fried
if at math.bu.edu
Fri Sep 7 17:11:55 EDT 2007
Bryant,
It is not clear to me why we should use all these dictionaries, where
we can use better, and to our greater advantage, our own brain.
I looked up TWOT and saw that he suggests that XALAH [of the famous
rhyme: I baked a little xalah, I baked it by myself, I put it in the
oven, I put it on the shelf,...] is some kind of bagel or pretzel
since its name implies that it is 'pierced'.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Bryant J. Williams III wrote:
> Dear Michael,
>
> Besides, BDB, I also use the following:
>
> 1) William Holladay, *A Concise Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of
> the Old
> Testament,* Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company,
> 1971.
> Originally published by E.J. Brill, Leiden, Netherlands.
>
> 2) R. Laird Harris, Editor; Gleason L. Archer, Bruce K. Waltke,
> Associate
> Editors, *Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament,* 2 Volumes,
> Chicago: Moody
> Press, 1980.
>
> In fact, regarding the issue of "chalal" versus "kalal," I would
> refer to TWOT,
> Vol. 1, page 288, "Halal."
>
> Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <michaelabernat9001 at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 10:04 AM
> Subject: [b-hebrew] resource material was chalal-perforate/pierce?
>
>
>> I am somewhat confused by the discussion of chalal. It
>> appears
>> that some argue there are two roots with similar but not identical
>> spelling.
>> One meaning to profane and the other having a meaning which
>> includes wound,
>> pain, pierce, etc. My resources are limited so I looked this up
>> in a couple
>> of modern Hebrew/English dictionaries and some of the more classical
>> lexicons.
>>
>> The modern dictionaries treated this word as one entry,
>> presumably
>> they only saw one root which included both the ideas of profane
>> and wounding
>> or killing.
>>
>> The classical lexicons also treat the word as being one
>> root with
>> diverse meanings including: pierce through, wound, to break, and
>> to lay open
>> or give access to. One lexicon goes on to explain that this is one
>> reason
>> the word came to mean profane because some things which were holy
>> were not
>> open to public access.
>>
>> I sometimes get the impression from this group that some
>> members
>> assume a theological bias on the part of scholars invalidates
>> their work.
>> (Some of these are also so outdated I hate to use them but at
>> least I can
>> afford them.) I can understand the sentiment but that does make it
>> difficult
>> to maintain communication on theologically charged passages. So,
>> here is my
>> question. Which lexicons and other resources are mutually
>> acceptable to both
>> our Jewish and Christian scholars who participate on this forum?
>> While I'm
>> asking, remember my resources are limited. I don't exactly live in
>> the
>> middle of nowhere. Nowhere is about fifteen miles down the road. I
>> would
>> appreciate it if our Jewish friends could identify any online
>> resources they
>> find acceptable.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Michael Abernathy
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> b-hebrew mailing list
>> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>>
>> For your security this Message has been checked for Viruses as a
>> courtesy of
> Com-Pair Services!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.8/993 - Release Date:
>> 09/06/07 3:18
> PM
>>
>>
>
>
> For your security this Message has been checked for Viruses as a
> courtesy of Com-Pair Services!
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
More information about the b-hebrew
mailing list