[b-hebrew] Kamatz katan; Ashkenazi pronunciation; was: Translating
VadimCherny at mail.ru
Tue Oct 3 03:36:51 EDT 2006
From: "Yitzhak Sapir"
> Why is this so? My working explanation is starts with the fact that
> among the many situations in Semitic that later developed to a qamatz
> in Hebrew, is a large class of instances that had a long "a". Hebrew
> Phoenician, and Canaanite developed long "a" into "o". Aramaic and
> Arabic did not. The qamatz was part of this "long a to o" change. This
> is the point where the Massoretes codified the vowels, so this is the
> stage the vowels represent. It appears to me, that later, probably under
> Arabic influence (which did not have the long a to o change), the words
> which had Arabic parallels with a long a, were reread with the qamats
> signifying "long a" again. In non-Arabic speaking countries, this did not
> happen. This change is one of the basic differences between "Ashkenazi"
> pronunciation and "Sefardi" pronunciation, Sefardi signifying spain and
> Arabic speaking countries, while Ashkanzi signifies other European
> countries. However, the Massoretes also used a qamats in situations
> that originally developed from other "non long a" cases. The Arabic did
> not have a "long a" in those cases and so did not influence the reading of
> Hebrew. Those are the situations of "qamats qatan", where the original
> qamats sound of "ow" remained. This is one such case. The original
> Semitic root behind this word is ")ukl", and this developed in Biblical
> Hebrew, without a suffix, as ")okel". Here, because of the suffix, the
> in ")okel" apparently became the "ow" of a "qamats".
The difference between kamatz and kamatz katan is rather simple.
Kamatz becomes katan in closed unaccented syllables.
Long a shortens to short o. [Long a elongates to au - long o. Similarly,
short a + u produces short o.]
The difference between Sephardi and Ashkenazi is also clear. It relates to
Germanized initial stress shift.
davAr - dAvar (initial stress shift of Germanized pronunciation) - dA:var
(elongation of open stressed vowel) - dOvar (a: - au - o) - dOv'r
(post-tonic vowel reduced without gemination). Now, there appears a problem
that two similar kamatz in davar are read differently. To solve that, open
stressed syllable is closed with iod which protects the next vowel, dOv'r -
dOivor. First o is long, the second is short.
I discuss those transformations at the end of
More information about the b-hebrew