[b-hebrew] Ayin and Ghayin
kwrandolph at email.com
Sun Sep 25 00:59:15 EDT 2005
I was not going to answer your response unless you
added new data, and you did:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir at gmail.com>
> In fact, how do you know Onkelos wasn't given to Moses?
> Where does the Onkelos say that it wasn't? So if you go by
> tradition for dating the Torah, you should go by tradition for the
> Zohar and Onkelos too, and date them accordingly, and then
> you have it -- complete and extensive religious texts from the time
> of Moses in Aramaic.
> I haven't. I relate to the Hebrew data the same way as
> the statue -- the time it is dated. The Massoretic data is
> dated according to the date of the manuscript whether it
> is the Leningrad Codex, or the Aleppo Codex. The DSS
> the same. The statue the same. All data on the same
> grounds. Like I said, by your method of dating, you'd need
> to consider Onkelos and the Zohar as originating in the
> time of Moses.
Do you know how ridiculous this sounds?
> Yitzhak Sapir
This, and the rest of your message are not worth
This message sent only as a matter of record.
Karl W. Randolph.
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
More information about the b-hebrew