[b-hebrew] word order
Peter Kirk
peter at qaya.org
Tue Nov 29 06:49:23 EST 2005
On 25/11/2005 01:05, Dave Washburn wrote:
> ...
>
>I'm one of them. I find it amusing that anyone uses a statistical argument
>for a base order of VSO, because the statistics are heavily skewed by the
>frequency of the wayyiqtol, which just about everyone agrees is a converted
>(i.e. secondary, not basal) form. ...
>
I'm not one of them. And I would have thought "just about everyone" is
an exaggeration. An alternative view which I thought was quite widely
accepted is that WAYYIQTOL is in fact a more original and ancient form,
an old proto-Semitic verb form, to which is attached the vav marking the
clause boundary. Because this form adheres to the original VSO word
order and is not used in secondary constructions in which the verb has
moved, the vav has become inseparable. - or perhaps jussives are
WAYYIQTOLs without their vav. I don't claim that this is necessarily
true, but I have seen no clear evidence that WAYYIQTOL is secondary,
rather than primary and reflecting the original dominant Hebrew word order.
--
Peter Kirk
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
More information about the b-hebrew
mailing list