[b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??, was: Labials and letter interchange

Peter Kirk peterkirk at qaya.org
Sat Sep 11 18:20:45 EDT 2004


On 11/09/2004 20:13, wattswestmaas wrote:

>Hallo members of the board,  Regarding the word SHALOM and SHALVAH.
>
>Is the 'waw' an interchange for the 'mem'?  Taking notice too of the
>differing roots proposed by another source ie: shin lamed mem for shalom and
>shin lamed waw (or Heh) for shalvah.
>
>Thanking you,  Chris  --  Ireland.
>
>PS thanking you for your comments on my last question posted.  Although the
>'raw data source' kindly given by you Peter was somewhat bewildering.
>
>  
>
Sorry, Chris. This is the official list transliteration, but here is a 
more user friendly version with references (to the Hebrew text) and the 
words in question with a user friendly transliteration.

Exodus 20:5 word 4: ta`obdem (hophal)
Exodus 23:24 word 4: ta`obdem (hophal)

Deuteronomy 5:9 word 4: ta`obdem (hophal)
Deuteronomy 13:3 word 13: wena`obdem (hophal)

2 Samuel 21:5 word 8: nishmadnu (niphal) (but does this one really have 
an object suffix? a more recent WTS morphology apparently analyses as 
niphal 1st person plural with no suffix)

Psalm 42:5 word 9: 'eddaddem (hithpael)
Psalm 109:3 word 4: wayyillaxamuni (niphal)

Isaiah 14:2 word 5: wehitnaxalum (hithpael)
Isaiah 44:21 word 11: tinnasheni (niphal)

Analyses as in the Westminster morphology, checked with a more recent 
version.

-- 
Peter Kirk
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/





More information about the b-hebrew mailing list