Diachronic study (History in Daniel)

Jason Hare parousia_occ at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 24 06:52:11 EST 2000


When doing a Jewish genealogy, one would often skip a generation (and 
sometimes two) and supply the word "father" instead of "grandfather."  
Notice with Joseph's sons.  When Jacob gave his blessings, he regarded 
Ephraim and Manasseh as his own rather than those of his son.  This is not 
something unusual, even in the third person.  Not to cross out of Hebrew, 
but I know the text of the B'riyt Khadashah a lot better than that of the 
Tanach (although I hope to remedy this).

Matthew was a Jewish tax-collector.  And he gives a genealgy of Jesus which 
employs this very feature.  Imagine it like this: "The heir of my heir is 
my heir."  So Nebuchadnezzar's son's son is still Nebbie's son.  That's how 
it works.  The Hebrew AV (aleph beth), meaning "father," does not only mean 
father, but forefather.  A common synagogue prayer includes: << Adonai 
Eloheinu veilohei avoteinu >> "Lord, our God and the God of our fathers."  
This does not refer to our dads because it often continues with "God of 
Abraham, God of Isaac, and God of Jacob."

Naturally, father can mean "ancestor."  There is room for Belshazzar to be 
Nebbie's grandson and old daddy to be off to war or whatever.  Especially 
if this is what is alluded to in outside sources (and it is).

Jason Hare



More information about the b-hebrew mailing list