[B-Greek] Verbal aspect theory -- misgivings
cwconrad2 at mac.com
Sat Nov 15 16:35:53 EST 2008
On Nov 15, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Ron Fay wrote:
> I must admit that while I am a "convert" to the "religion" of VAT, I
> do have some moderately heretical practices.
> 1) I will say that while time plays no part in aspect, generally the
> aorist is past, present is present, etc.
I am one of those old-timers who thinks that the indicative of the
imperfect and the aorist and the pluperfect -- the augmented "tenses"
do indeed involve time.
> 2) There is no such thing (in any system) of classifying the perfect
> and pluperfect correctly, though VAT comes the closest. While the
> stative understanding makes the most sense, it still does not fit
> all occurrences. I had not acknowledged that the aorist and perfect
> had begun to blend in Koine, but now that you have said that it fits
> with some of my reading.
> In all, I think your misgivings and cautions make sense, and
> certainly you should not feel alone. As I tell my students, VAT is
> useful, but reading Greek is still about 30% art.
It is TRANSLATING Greek that is an art. Reading Greek is wholly a
matter -- pure and simple -- of knowing the language. Of course so
much of Biblical Greek pedagogy seems to confuse reading with
> The only way to master the text is to be in the text. Oh, and
> everyone should have at least two years of Classical also, hehe.
> - Ron
> Ron C. Fay, PhD
> Associate Pastor of Administration and Teaching
> Cornerstone Community Church
> Wadsworth, IL
> roncfay at hotmail.com
> See how Windows® connects the people, information, and fun that are
> part of your life
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
More information about the B-Greek