[B-Greek] Talking Points & Expectations: Why Learn (Biblical) Greek?
kline_dekooning at earthlink.net
Fri Aug 24 14:03:42 EDT 2007
On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Aesop Coordinator wrote:
> The ultimate goal of the first type of student is to read and think in
> (bibilical) Greek (my goal for them is read, read, read..)
> The minimal goal of the second type of student is to "learn how to
> intelligently use commentaries and reference works that will
> produce more
> beneficial Bible study with minimal knowledge of New Testament
> Greek." (some
> would say, 'Buy a good translation')
I remember decades ago hearing this "minimal goal" being used as the
objective for a "greek tools" course where the student learned the
alphabet and was given some instruction on how to use BAG (1st
Ed) ... ktl. I have come to think there is a significant flaw in this
approach. The assumption that it takes less knowledge of Greek to
"intelligently use commentaries and reference works" than it does to
read in Greek, I am now convinced, is a false assumption.
I have been working for several weeks in the epistle of James. I have
at my disposal, J.B. Mayor, Alford, Huther, Adamson, Davids,
Dibelius. Following the arguments, i.e,, "intelligent use" of Mayor,
Alford, Huther, Dibelius requires a significant level of effort on my
part. The notion that someone who has taken a "greek tools" course
will be able to make "intelligent use" of commentaries like these is
IMHO wrong. I might be tempted extend this generalization to include
Danker (BDAG). Can someone make "intelligent use" of Danker who
cannot read a sentence in Greek?
I think we set people up for frustration and disillusionment by
encouraging expectations which cannot be realized.
More information about the B-Greek