[B-Greek] Romans 12:2
dirkzwager at pandora.be
Sun Feb 13 03:07:34 EST 2005
The three adjectives are united indeed.
They are to a certain grade distinct TO QELHMA TOU QEOU, being an
I would not make them a late explanation of or an apposition to QUSIAN etc.,
for in connection with QUSIAN the adjective EUARESTON has been used already
and another apposition can be read there too (THN LOGIKHN LATREIAN hUMWN).
Dr. A. Dirkzwager
e-mail dirkzwager at pandora.be
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: <MAKARIOIOIPRAEIS at aol.com>
Aan: <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Verzonden: zondag 13 februari 2005 7:48
Onderwerp: [B-Greek] Romans 12:2
> TO [AGAQON KAI hEURESTON KAI TELEION]
> is a TSKSKS construction, wouldn't this make the three adjectives
> grammatically united and suggesting that it is distinct from
> TO [QELHMA TOU QEOU] ?
> In other words could, TO AGAQON KAI hEURESTON KAI TELEION refer back to
> statement "...your bodies as a living sacrifice....EUARESTON TW QEW"
> as described in Lev 22:19-25 for the sacrificial animals , ..."it must be
> perfect to be accepted..."
> Richard Windisch
> B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
More information about the B-Greek