[B-Greek] Colossians 2:8
mjriii2003 at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 9 13:08:23 EDT 2005
BLEPETE MH TIS hUMAS ESTAI hO SULAGWGWN DIA THS FILOSOFIAS KAI KENHS APATAS KATA THN PARADOSIN TWN ANQROPWN KAI KATA TA STOICEIA TOU KOSMOU KAI OU KATA CRISTON.
My question is a simple one. The position of hUMAS strikes me as quite awkard. It could be understood as the direct object of hO SULAGWGWN, but could it legitimately be by virtue of it's position in the text the accusative of respect? In other words I know it can but is it more probable and nature?
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the B-Greek