Matthew 5: 18-19

Steven Lo Vullo slovullo at mac.com
Sun Oct 6 16:26:20 EDT 2002


On Sunday, October 6, 2002, at 02:40 PM, jldrick at juno.com wrote:

> Gang,
>
> 	"AMHN GAR LEGW hUMIN, hEWS AN
> PARELQNi hO OURANOS KAI hH GH, IWTA hEN
> hH MIA KERAIA OU MH PARELQHi APO TOU
> NOMOU, hEWS AN PANTA GENHTAI"
>
> 	Does "hEWS AN PARELQNi hO OURANOS
> KAI hH GH" modify "IWTA hEN hH MIA KERAIA OU
> MH PARELQHi APO TOU NOMOU," or does it modify
> "LEGW hUMIN."
>
> 	I have not been able to find other New
> Testament examples of two hEWS AN clauses
> forming a "sandwich" like this.

Greetings, Jim:

I would analyse as follows: IWTA hEN H MIA KERAIA OU MH PARELQHi APO 
TOU NOMOU is a nominal clause, the object of LEGW. It seems that both 
indefinite temporal clauses introduced by hEWS AN are subordinate to 
PARELQHi.
============

Steven R. Lo Vullo
Madison, WI




More information about the B-Greek mailing list